HTX under pressure from EU and UK sanctions

Against the backdrop of a large-scale wave of international crypto exchanges leaving the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, the attention of traders and investors is focused on the HTX platform (formerly Huobi). In specialized communities, reports have become more frequent about the possible cessation of the exchange’s work with Russian residents, similar to the recent decisions of MEXC and Bitget. However, detailed legal and on-chain analysis shows that the situation around HTX is of a fundamentally different nature: the exchange did not issue public statements about the total ban of Russian accounts, but found itself in the grip of strict international restrictions.

The fundamental trigger for the aggravation of the situation was direct sanctions: in the spring, the UK government added Huobi Global S.A. to the sanctions list, and in the summer, the European Union included HTX in its 21st package of anti-Russian restrictions for assistance in bypassing financial barriers. Although HTX management is trying to distance the trading platform from legal entities subject to restrictions, the exchange’s user agreement already contains rules on limiting work in sanctioned jurisdictions, and global blockchain analytics systems have begun to assign the highest level of risk to all operations with HTX.

How is the situation on HTX different from the official departure of MEXC and Bitget?

The legal status of the exchange significantly diverges from public market expectations:

  • Public status: no official order on the forced liquidation of Russian Federation accounts
  • Sanctions background: UK sanctions (May 2026) and the 21st package of EU restrictions (July 2026)
  • EU legal mechanisms: a complete ban on any payments between EU entities and the HTX platform
  • Internal regulations: clauses of the user agreement on the risks of blocking during a compliance audit
  • Current availability: maintaining the operation of the P2P section and basic spot trading with Russian documents

EU and UK sanctions packages against Huobi Global structures

The inclusion of exchange structures in the UK and EU sanctions registers has created a serious precedent for a large trading platform with Asian roots. Regulators have directly linked HTX brand companies to providing infrastructure for the cross-border movement of sanctioned funds. In contrast to standard license revocation procedures, European regulations prohibit any institutional counterparties, market makers and payment providers from the EU from maintaining direct or indirect financial contacts with HTX, cutting off the exchange from European fiat gateways and institutional liquidity.

Preserving interface functionality against hidden legal risks

Unlike MEXC, which set clear deadlines for withdrawing funds and disconnecting Russians, HTX continues to support registration using Russian documents, authorization and P2P transactions for rubles. The management of the platform claims that the operational activities of the online exchange are shared with the sanctioned legal entity Huobi Global S.A. However, lawyers point out that the HTX user agreement directly reserves the administration’s right to freeze funds or limit withdrawals at any time without prior notice if the account is subject to sanctions checks by international supervisory authorities.

Why are transfers of funds from HTX threatened with blocking on other exchanges?

The main danger for asset holders lies in the consequences of withdrawing funds to the external ecosystem:

High Risk marking in Chainalysis and Crystal analytical systems

The main threat to asset holders on HTX has shifted from the plane of interaction with the exchange itself to the sphere of on-chain checks by third-party platforms. Leading analytical AML complexes (Elliptic, Chainalysis, Crystal Blockchain) have included HTX depositary and hot wallets in the registers of sanctioned objects. As a result, cryptocurrency withdrawn from HTX automatically receives an increased risk score (Red Flag). When attempting to make such a deposit on sites with strict compliance (for example, Bybit, KuCoin or regulated European services), the transaction is delayed, and the user is required to confirm the legality of the origin of the capital.

Recommendations for secure cleaning and storage of digital assets

Information security specialists strongly recommend that Russian users do not use HTX as a storage depository or transit gateway. If it is necessary to withdraw assets from the platform, direct transfers to other centralized exchanges should be avoided to avoid “contamination” of external balances. The best practice remains to transfer cryptocurrency to your own cold hardware wallets or use non-custodial protocols with an intermediate change of addresses and checking the purity of coins through independent AML checkers.

Editor at CryptoInside

The crypto market isn't just about numbers—it's a complex ecosystem where politics, technology, and economics intertwine. In my news coverage, I strive not merely to recount events, but to analyze their real impact on the market. My goal is to make cryptocurrency news clear, accessible, and objective.

Share: